Comms that
survive the crowd.
A low-cost mesh network device that keeps text messages and location sharing alive when 50,000 phones on one cell tower means none of them work.
Cell networks buckle exactly when you need them most
In areas of extremely high device density, cellular reception can't handle every phone trying to access the network at once. Even the simplest functions stop going through: calls, texts, location services. The exact things you'd reach for in an emergency.
Move critical messages off the saturated band
Build a mesh network system that keeps high-priority cellular services functioning in large crowds. It routes over a separate frequency band (LoRa or Wi‑Fi HaLow) that never touches standard cell frequencies, so it can't add to the congestion it's working around.
What the solution can't do
- Whether it's a protocol or a device, it must never obstruct any other function of the phone or cellular network.
- As a device: it must also be lightweight, low-cost to the consumer, and durable enough to survive weather and being worn on a person all day.
- Low power enough to run for a full day on a battery, transmitting only when required, not continuously.
What has to work, in order
Core
Text messages and location updates transmit reliably over the mesh network.
Milestone 2
Voice calls transmit over the network.
Stretch
Direct contact to medical services from the device.
Differentiator
Better form factor and lower cost than existing competitors, achieved by using the phone as the interface instead of building a new one from scratch.
Spec targets
Competitors
TotemCompass and CrowdCompass both ship hardware for this exact problem. Both build a full custom interface onto the device itself rather than leaning on the phone people already carry, which drives up cost and bulk.
| Totem Compass | Crowd Compass | Ravenet (target) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max group size | 8 people | N/A | 1,000 people |
| Cost | $113 CAD | $177 | $10–20 BOM |
| Messaging | No | Yes | Yes |
| Protocol | Custom 2.4 GHz | LoRa | LoRa / Wi‑Fi HaLow |
| Map (see friends) | No | Yes | Yes |
| Interface | On-device | On-device | Your phone |
Why not satellite phones?
- Prohibitively expensive for the average attendee.
- Not everyone owns one, or would think to bring one to an event.
- Shared satellite bandwidth would likely hit the same network-flooding problem at high density.
Drawbacks we're designing around
Phones die over a long event
A dead phone can't run our app, no matter how good the mesh is.
Adoption depends on density
A mesh network needs enough devices nearby to actually form hops.
Design Log
Dated entries of what the team worked on, who worked on it, and what changed. Updated regularly through requirements, prototyping, and testing.